Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts

Monday, July 18, 2016

Against the Syntehtic Portrait, For the Snapshot by Aleksandr Rodchenko, 1928




 File:1920s Rodchenko and Stepanova.jpg
“Any intelligent man will tell you about the photograph’s shortcomings in comparison to the painted portrait’ everyone will tell you about the character of the Mona Lisa, and everyone forgets that portraits were painted when there was no photography and that they were painted not of all the intelligent people but of the rich and powerful. Even men of science were not painted.

You need not wait around, intelligentsia; even now AKhRR artists will not paint you. True- they cant even depict the sum total, let alone .001 of a moment.

Now compare eternity in science and technology. In olden times a savant would discover a truth, and this truth would remain law for about twenty years. And this was learned and learned as something indisputable and immutable.

Encyclopedias were compiled that supplied whole generations with their eternal truths.

Does anything of the kind exist now?... No.

Now people do not live by encyclopedias but by newspapers, magazines, card catalogues, prospectuses, and directionaries.

Modern science and technology are not searching for truths, but are opening up new areas of work and with every day change what has been attained.” 


“It should be stated firmly that with the appearance of photographs, there can be no question of a single, immutable portrait. Moreover, a man is not just one sum total; he is many, and sometimes they are quite opposed.”


“Art has no place in modern life. it will continue to exist as long as there is a mania for the romantic and as long as there are people who love lies and deception.

Every modern cultured man must wage war against art, as against opium.

Photograph and be photographed!”

Not sure if I agree with that last part but… 


“Crystallize man not by a single ‘synthetic’ portrait, but by a whole lot of snapshots taken at different times and in different conditions.” (Nowadays, one may say selfies :))


“Paint the truth.”


“Value all that is real and contemporary.

And we will be real people, not actors.” 

--
Publishing Information: 
Russian Art of the Avant Garde Theory and Criticism Revised and Enlarged Edition edited by John E. Bowlt 

From Pictures to Textile Prints by Osip Brik, 1924


Caricature of Osip Brik, variant for the cover of the journal LEF (Left Front of the Arts), Alexander Rodchenko
“Moreover, the conviction is gaining ground that the picture is dying, that it is indissolubly linked with the forms of the capitalist regime, with its cultural ideology, that the textile print is not becoming the center of creative attention, and that the textile print and work on it are the apex of artistic labor.” 


“The easel picture is not only unnecessary to our contemporary artistic culture, it is also one of the most powerful brakes on its development.”


“The point is that easel painters do not deny the importance and necessity of other forms of artistic culture. They fully tolerate the existence of agit-posters, sketches for textile prints and book covers; they simply affirm that all these ‘subsidiary’ forms are inconceivable without easel painting, that easel painting is the creative base on which painterly culture is built.

Hence the conclusion: if you want to make good textile prints, learn to paint landscapes.”


“After mastering the ‘secrets’ of easel painting, he thereby masters the ‘secrets’ of any painterly work, whether it is a textile print, a book cover, a poster, or theatrical décor.” 


“Let us assume that partial coincidences are possible, that some of the devices can prove to be general; why should one craft prove to be fundamental vis-à-vis another? why should the making of a still life be more “fundamental” than that of a textile print? Why should one first of all learn how to do a still life and then undertake textile prints, and not vice versa?”


“But the easel painters forget that the picture is not science, but practice, that it establishes no ‘general’ tenets. The experience of the easel painter is not that of the artist in general, but is only the experience of a single, individual case of painterly labor.”


“All the same, work in industry will always be inferior for the easel painter. That is why it is not the easel painters who will discover the methods of this work, and not from easel painting that the solution of productional art problems will ensue.” 


“Indeed, artistic labor and factory work are still disunited. The artist is still an alien in the factory. People treat him with suspicion. They do not let him come too close. They do not believe him they cannot understand why he needs to know technolgocal processes, why he needs information of a purely industrial nature. His job is to draw, to make drawing-s and the factory’s job is to select suitable ones and to stick them onto the ready-made finished product.” 


“Hence the inevitable applied art- the result of the artist’s alienation from industry. Not receiving the necessary economic directives, he resorts, willy-nilly, to aesthetic stereotypes.

But what is the conclusion from this?

Forward! To overcome this alienation.

Forward! To the union of the artist and the factory.

And by no means back to pure easel painting, back to pictures.

The progressive artists are already under way- from the picture to the textile print, and of course, why will not turn back. But that is not enough. it is essential that the whole mass of our young artists should realize that this is the only true path and that it is precisely by this path that artistic culture will develop.” 


“The artistic culture of the future is being created in factories and plants, not in attic studios.

May the young artists remember this- unless they wish to turn up prematurely in the archives, together with the proud easel painters.” 

--
Publishing Information: 
Russian Art of the Avant Garde Theory and Criticism Revised and Enlarged Edition edited by John E. Bowlt 

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Cubism by David Burliuk, 1912


"These definitions in themselves show that everyone, even the  most Ignorant and those with no interest in the Spiritual, perceives the eternal gulf that has arisen between the painting of yesterday and the painting of today. An eternal gulf. Yesterday we did not have art."

“The fat bourgeois have shifted their shameful attention from the artist, and now this magician and sorcerer has the chance of escaping to the transcendental secrets of his art.”

“The component elements into which the essential nature of painting can be broken down are:
           I.                    Line
          II.                  Surface
         III.                Color
         IV.                Texture

To a certain extent Elements I and II were properties, peculiarities of old painting as well. But I and IV are those fabulous realms that only our twentieth century has discovered and whose painterly significance Nature has revealed to us. Previously painting only Sa, now it Feels. Previously it depicted an object in two dimensions, now wider possibilities have been disclosed… I am not talking about what the near future will bring us (this has already been discovered by such artists as P. P. Konchalovsky)- a Sense of Visual ponderability- A Sense of color Smell. A sense of duration of the colored moment… (I. I. Mashkov).” 

“The man deprived of a Painterly understanding of Nature will, when looking at Cezanne’s landscape the House, understand it puerely narritavely: (I) “house” (2) mountains (3) trees (4) sky. Whereas for the artist, there existed I linear construction II surface construction (not fully realized) and III color orchestration. For the artist, there were certain lines going up and down, right and left, but there wasn’t a house or trees… there were areas of certain color strength, of certain character. And that’s all.” 

An artist’s experience painting.

“Painting of the past, too, seemed at times to be not far from conceiving Nature as Line (of a certain character and of certain intensity) and colors (Nature as a number of colored areas- this applies Only to the Impressionists at the end of the ninetheenth century). But it never made up its mind to analyze visual Nature from the viewpoint of the essence of its surface. The conception of what we see as merely a number of certain definite sections of different surface Planes arose only in the twentieth century under the name of Cubism. Like everything else, Cubism has its history. Briefly, we can indicate the sources of this remarkable movement.”

“A few years ago artists wouldn’t have forgiven themselves if they’d talked about the aims, tasks, and essence of Painting. Times have changed. Nowadays not to be a theoretician of painting means to reject an understanding of it.”

“It has been known for a long time that what is important is not the what, but the how, i.e., which principles, which objectives, guided the artist’s creation of this or that work! it is essential to establish on the basis of which canon it (the work) arose! It is essential to reveal its painterly nature! It must be indicated what the aim in Nature was that the artist of the given picture was So attracted by. And the analysis of painterly phenomena will then be a Scientific criticism of the subject.”

“Disharmony is the opposite of harmony.
Dissymmetry is the opposite of symmetry.
Deconstruction is the opposite of construction.
A canon can be constructive.
A canon can be deconstructive.
Construction can be shifted or displaced
The canon of displaced construction.

“The existence in Nature of visual poetry- ancient, dilapidated towers and walls- points to the essential, tangible, and forceful supremacy of this kind of beauty.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


David Burliuk seemed to have had a great personality. His energy is one of the most inspiring out of the Russian Avant-garde movement.



--

Publishing Information: 
Russian Art of the Avant Garde Theory and Criticism Revised and Enlarged Edition edited by John E. Bowlt 

Thursday, February 4, 2016

The Principles of New Art by Vladimir Markov


"The Chinese liked to cover their vases with glaze of copper oxide, but the results of this operation were completely subject to chance. Depending on how the gases circulated around the object, it could turn any color- from white to bright red, blue or black. Because of this, the most unexpected, most beautiful combination and distributions of colored areas sometimes occur. No rational combinations could create such beauty; it is beyond the means of rational, constructive creation.”

“So essentially the principles of chance is not the result of rational processes consciously oriented toward a certain aim and is not even a game played by a hand ungoverned by the apparatus of thought, but is the consequence of completely blind, extrinsic influences.”

“Chance opens up whole worlds and begets wonders. Many wonders, unique harmonies and scales, the enchanting shades common to Chinese and Japanese pictures owe their existence only to the fact that they arose by chance, were appreciated by a sensitive eye, and were crystallized.”

 “In playing, we express our ‘I’ more vividly and unconstrainedly and emerge no longer as the masters of forces hidden within us, but as their slaves.”

"To be ugly and absurd externally does not mean to possess no inner values.
So, the principle of free art affords its ardent and passionate protection to all those absurd mamninfestations of man's soul, to that coarse and vulgar face, as it were, of art, which is so persecuted in Europe.

"In general, one can say that this apparent coarseness, vulgarit, lubok quality appeared, and began to be exploited, quite late in time and that it is the fate of only certain peoples.

"For many peoples this is a competely closed area. However much they may struggle, they will always remian graceful and delicate and will never create that distinctive lyricism that is concealed beneath the cover of the absurd and simple: the lyricism that Byzantium discovered after penetrating this area and developing it in all directions."

"It often happens that the 'I' that we have expressed turnsout, after a little reflection, to be not our 'I' at all." 

"Now one asks, was he expressing his own opinion when he flew into raptures over his purchase? I am inclined to think not. In his rapture he was sincere, but in that superfcial, shallow sense applicable to all the followers of fashion- that epidemic, that tyrant of men's opinions and tastes. I say in a superficial sense, because his raptures were not founded on the inward order of his soul created  by the presence of all impressions from reality; they were founded merely on a simple order of feelings from the conception evoked, a conception that conceals and gradually corrodes the peculiar depths of the soul." 

"And wherever fashion appears, it drives deep down into the soul that which has grown and stratified over thousdands of years and in its place foists on people its cheap, marketplace conception of beauty." 

"All this indicates that the free expression of our 'I' has dangerous enemies, becuase of which it is very difficult for man to be sincere in teh sense of freely expressing his inner essence adn not some surrogate evoked by chance.
Hence it is interesting to ask: which expression of the 'I' has more value? The expression of the 'I' that bursts from us spontaneously or the 'I' that is passed through the filter of thought?"



“Why do we think one thing, and not another, why does my glance slip into one direction and not another, why does my hand do this and not that? In all this there is sometimes no element of logic or actively directed will, and an audacious galloping about, striking changes of stimuli are always going on.
Thus, first by some miracle a brilliant thought sometimes imprints itself on the chaos of thinking, an intuitive solution to a task, a problem that had beset us for such a long time. Where does it come from?
Second, there are occasions when ideas, colors, tones, melodies of a particular order simply thrust themselves on us, and we are unable to shake them off because, like a volcano, they require an outlet.
And with dynamic force they appear at the first opportunity.
And we cannot be responsible for these phenomena, we cannot be accused of their appearance, just as we cannot be accused of our dreams and fancies.
In the same way, wec annot be responsible for our ideas taking forms in their embodiment seem, as it were, absurd and coarse but that demand their realization in precisely these forms.”




“I would go so far as to say that there is no art without plagiarism, and even the freest art is based on plagiarism in the above sense because beloved forms of the past instilled in our SOUL unconsciously repeat themselves.”




Which unites all of humanity. 

“It is not my task to analyze our ‘I’ in all its diversity, in all its nuances- that is the province of psychology; but i would like to distinguish three characteristic stages in it that to a greater or lesser extent determine our creative work.

First, the hidden, subconscious ‘I’, something that has appeared from one knows not where, often completely alien and fortuitous but at the same time, of course, individual, because in any case the right basis, whether temporary or permanent, has appeared within it..

Second, the ‘I’, also hidden, but already mature, something that we are aware of, which is organically inherent to the individuum and transmitted to it atavistically: it is all those impulses, stimuli that, like a ripe seed, demand an outlet, tormented and cramp it.

Third, the ‘I’ that presents the outward manifestation of these two hidden, individual ‘I’’s mentioned above.

In free art, of course, it is the third ‘I’ that interests us, but it does not emerge as the direct echo o fthe two preceding ‘I’s, it does not express the aggregate of the impressions and mysteries that accumulated in them, because much is lost through the effect of many outside factors encountered in the process of its manifestation that operate directly or indirectly.”

“Free creation is inherent in the artist not as a simple desire to be original, to play pranks, or to demonstrate ridiculous affectation, but as one of the means of satisfying the creative needs of man’s soul.”
  


“But, in any case, those factors that impede the free manifestation of our ‘I’ and choice it with alien surrogates should be acknowledged as undesirable.”




“We can distinguish an alien ‘I’ and any factors that impede our full manifestation of the ‘I’ by criticism and other means.

Therefore those works that the public sees marked as free action painting about which they imagine that their little Peter could daub ten such paintings at home are, as far as the artist is concerned, not works of over exuberant mischievousness or of a frolicsome brush; they are a product in which not a single spot, not one shade can be altered, a product that has appeared as a result of suffering, of long, persistent inner work, searching and experience.

Hence free creation contains the essentials of true creation and stands high above simple imitation; in now ay is it a game or mischief making, and by no means can’t be called the simple need to liberate the self from an inner repletion of life-giving energy (dissimilation).

Forms attained by the application of the principle of free creation are sometimes a synthesis of complex analyses and sensations; they are the only forms capable of expressing and embodying the creator’s intentions vis-à-vis nature and the inner world of his ‘I’.” 

“And it often seems that the absurd forms are not the echo and translation of nature but the echo of the creator’s inner psychology.” 


“The principle of free creation represents essentially the apogee in economy of resources and the last expenditure of technical devise, at the same time it proves the truest and most powerful echo of the Divine Beauty that man has sensed.” 


“And only narrow-mined doctrinaires and dunderhead philistines can demand that art should forever remain on safe, well-trodden paths, that it should not burst the dam of realism and depart for the endless horizons of free creation.



"A man possesses an ocean of impressions. He often receives stimuli that he does not see but only feels: in creating freely, obedient to his feeling, he depicts an object quite contrary to how he sees it.

Behind the outer covering of every object, there hides its secret, its rhythm- and the artist is given the ability to divine this secret, to react to the object’s rhythm, and to find forms to manifest this rhythm.

The lost image, word, melody, verse have often irrevocably sunk into oblivion, but the soul preserves and cherishes their rhythm, remaining in it as their eternal ndelible echo. And this rhythm guides the hand when he should wishes to restore lost beauty. The outward expression is often completely unattained, but we hold it dear by virtue of its analogous rhythm, its beauty equivalent to the forgotten object.

And often in objects seemingly absurd and coarse, there lies a wealth of inner beauty, rhythm, and harmony that you will not encounter in objects constructed by the mind on principle of pure proportion or practical truth.

Free creation is the mother of art. Free creation raises us above ‘this world’- this is its great prerogative.”


**********************************************************************************

“The aspiration to other worlds is inherent in man’s nature. Man does not want to walk, he demands dancing; he does not want to speak, he demands song; he does not want the earth but strains toward the sky. The surest path to this sky is FREE creation.”
 **********************************************************************************

--

Publishing Information: 
Russian Art of the Avant Garde Theory and Criticism Revised and Enlarged Edition edited by John E. Bowlt